Thank you very much Ralf, from your kind explaination, i'm clear about this problem deepth now. Well, i think i have a direction to fix this problem, maybe MMC compaitbility is not far away aswing now... :)
Thanx Nicolas, haXe seem cool, today i just wondering if MMC do not make me happy, i'll just throw up it, then haXe maybe the best choice since it has a good compiler even better than mtasc.
2005/12/10, Nicolas Cannasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> One question remains though. Why is mtasc able to compile it correctly.
> This could either be a coincidence, because the compiler chooses a
> working order by chance or mmc really has a bug. I'm not sure about it.
>
> Cheers,
> Ralf.
MTASC has pretty good heuristic in order to determize the generation
order of the classes. haXe is even a bit more powerful.
See this mail :
http://lists.motion-twin.com/pipermail/haxe/2005-December/000156.html
Nicolas
_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
--
iiley
AsWing http://www.aswing.org
Blog http://spaces.msn.com/members/iiley/
_______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
