> On the other hand, i would not like to have the feeling to owe them > something.
that's a good point. somewhat related is the issue how it would be perceived from the outside. most here have a "traditional" flash background. i'm always glad each time new users with no prior flash experience appear, especially linux users, because it means osflash is slowly becoming known among developers who wouldn't even have considered the platform previously. i'm hoping gnash will help in that regard, too, once it becomes usable. imho, it would be good for the platform and for osflash alike if it would find acceptance in that area, however, official ties to adobe could give some people a false impression, especially since they wouldn't know the background. i'd much rather read positive comments about adobe's openness towards an independent open source movement in some future /. discussions than weird conspiracy theories by the trolls. mark On 1/21/06, Ralf Bokelberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, we all appreciate it for sure, if Adobe provides documentation, > open source software, breeze conferences and open source friendly eulas. > > On the other hand, i would not like to have the feeling to owe them > something. In fact, if Adobe is clever, they know, that unconditionally > supporting osflash is good for Flash and thus themself. I'm pretty > confident, that developer centric people like Mike Chambers see it in > similar ways. I'm not so sure about the marketing people, though. > > Cheers, > Ralf. -- http://snafoo.org/ jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
