Hi Igor, I know that personally I would see this as far too much abstraction for any of my projects. ie., I don't believe that the additional risk imposed by the additional code for this could be justified given the potential benefits at some point when you want to change frameworks, even if the proxy did work 100% (and, with no component framework I've worked with working 100%, I can't see how that's achievable.)
Again, just my personal view, which, combined with the views of others will hopefully help you get a better idea for the need that's out there. Btw, AsBind sounds very exciting and I'd love to see how you implemented it because similar things are being considered for future releases of Arp and I'd hate for us to reinvent the wheel and/or not examine all available alternatives before jumping in. All the best, Aral Igor V. Sadovskiy wrote: >I think I need to explain my ideas more clearly. > >I already have some framework (AsBind). It allows to easy create Model-View >controller layer for RIA Flash applications used WebServices as data source >and MX V2 Components as users front-end without extra efforts (even without >ActionScript programming skills). It has special markup XML language allowed >to fire data transfer sessions, initialize UI components with received data, >control its accuracy, validate it, pack to the data sources and send back to >server. It also allowed to define some scenarios (sequences of actions). >Also developer could implement his own actions and event handlers to control >whole or parts of the process by themselves. ><snip> > _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
