<<youhou great news i thinks that OSFLASH is doing good for the flash platform community
Gilles Le 01-févr.-06 à 10:07, Francis Bourre a écrit : > unbelievable, that's great news !!! > > francis > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David Mendels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Open Source Flash Mailing List" <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 8:26 AM > Subject: [osflash] Free compiler (was FW: [Fwd: Re: MTASC Future]) > > >> Hi, >> >> A few months ago, Claus wrote on this list: "unless macromedia >> releases >> their compiler for free (unlikely)" >> >> I replied: ""or unless macromedia releases their compiler for free >> (unlikely)" I won't say this is or is not likely, but I would guess >> that much of what we have released lately (a public alpha, a cmd line >> compiler, an eclipse based tool, the Flex framework with that >> tool, etc) >> would have been considered "unlikely" by many even a few weeks >> ago, and >> yet here they are. Your guess is pretty reasonable here, but we like >> surprising ourselves too :)" >> >> Well, I couldn't be more specific at the time, but I am pleased to >> let >> folks know now that we are indeed releasing the compiler and >> framework >> and limited version of the FES server for free: >> http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/060201/20060131006223.html?.v=1 -;) >> >> >> Regards, >> David >> Adobe >> >> >> >>> >>> -------- Original Message -------- >>> Subject: Re: [osflash] MTASC Future >>> Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 01:43:56 +0200 >>> From: Claus Wahlers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Open Source Flash Mailing List >>> <[email protected]> >>> To: Open Source Flash Mailing List <[email protected]> >>> References: >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> >>>> It's unfortunate to hear this. Is this because you are >>> thinking that >>>> too much of the syntax would need to change? Or is it more >>> because you >>>> would need compatability with other flash libraries to make >>> it worthwhile to do? >>>> Or something else? >>>> >>>> Based on what Nicolas has been doing so far, changes wouldn't be >>>> frivolous and largely for the better, but I understand that >>> often the >>>> reliability of compatability is the major driving force for >>> a library. >>>> I'm just asking so that I understand if that's what it is. >>> >>> i planned to start developing DENG2 end of this year. this >>> would have been no problem, i can start developing with >>> macromedias tools today, and later, when MTASC for AS3 would >>> have been available, switch, as we did with DENG1 (first >>> Flash MX, then Kinetic Fusion). >>> >>> now i have to wait until MTASC for [xxx] becomes available >>> *and* becomes mature enough for it's bytecode to run >>> seamlessly on the 8.5 player. i can't forsee when this will >>> be the case. in any case, i have to wait, because i won't >>> rewrite DENG a third time. the problem is that i don't know >>> how much longer i can wait, because then i may focus on >>> something else i spend my free time on. >>> >>> i also can't rely on the MMC alone, because my contributors >>> (who are not "flashers") are never going to buy it. i need an >>> open source compiler. i can't tell my contributors to buy a >>> compiler to compile code they gracefully contribute, and DENG >>> contributors are hard enough to find. >>> >>> unless i find some angel investment, or unless macromedia >>> releases their compiler for free (unlikely), there is not >>> much of a chance i start porting DENG using macromedia tools >>> alone (this would probably become a one-man-show then, as in >>> the flash developer world DENG is of not much interest). i >>> lost a lot of money developing DENG1 already (2 years >>> fulltime), and this definately won't happen again. >>> >>> summarizing, there is a small chance i'm going to do it, but >>> only a very small one, depending on what happens in the >>> future, which i'm unable to forsee at this point.. >>> cheers, >>> claus. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> osflash mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org >>> >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> osflash mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org >> > > > _______________________________________________ > osflash mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
