Sorry its been so long Zoli, this email got lots in the pile of "enhancement" emails I seem to get :)
I was not stating that service mapping was insecure, what I was suggesting is that fluorine should be default block all services that are not explicitly names in a service mapping configuration. Developer, being developers often forget things, and before you know it, someone will have figured out the services in a developers page and be using services that were not intended for public consumption to destroy data. I do software security for a living and file holes in software all the time from seasoned developers. I'd love to see a service mapping section for Fluorine, I'm using Fluorine right now on 2 projects. Grant. Zoli said : ...I cannot see why service mapping is considered secure (?) _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
