> When this work around is introduced it works as intended in MTASC as well. > Am I right thinking this is a bug in MTASC's way of handling super?
That's a possibility, I'll have a look at it when I work on MTASC. Nicolas _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
