> To me, this seems to imply that the situation which I mentioned above > for C applications is correct. So my question is this: is compiling a > swf which contains LGPL code the same thing as a statically linked > library in terms of this license? If so, it seems to me that LGPL code > must be used with more care in actionscript than in other languages > (which lend themselves to easier use of dynamically linking). > > Dan
The linking exception of the LGPL is not so much easy to port to other architectures than C. However I think that a loadMovie would clearly be considered to be dynamic linking. Nicolas _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
