sorry, I have not been happening to look a lot at the mailing lately...
Well yes, it is currently one of the limitations of sexier, it cannot parse correctly instructions written on multlipe lines.
I guess that if the animation package is written like that I will have to ameliorate this soon, but I do not have time to modify sexier at the present time.
Sorry again, but anyway, thanks a lot for using sexier and your feedback :)
Clément
2006/4/20, Tomas Lehuta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello Clement and OSFlashers,I'm using SexieR in an Ant build task and trying to built intrinsic classes for my project with dependencies..It works fine unless analysed dependency classes use more lines for class or function declarations.For example class is not parsed correctly for syntax like this:class de.alex_uhlmann.animationpackage.animation.MoveOnQuadCurve
extends AnimationCore
implements ISingleAnimatable {private function initAnimation(x1:Number, y1:Number, x2:Number,
y2:Number, x3:Number, y3:Number, withControlpoints:Object,
duration:Object, easing:Object, callback:String):Void {...}}Generated intrinsic class then looks like this:intrinsic class de.alex_uhlmann.animationpackage.animation.MoveOnQuadCurve {private function initAnimation(x1:Number, y1:Number, x2:Number, ;
...
}and this generates compile errors..Tomas Lehuta [http://lharp.net
]
_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
_______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
