Marcelo de Moraes Serpa schrieb: > Thanks for the explanation Geoff :) > > On 5/2/06, Geoff Stearns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> there's a few subtle differences... the main thing is that ufo keeps all >> the code in the head of the document, and waits for the html to load, then >> swaps the stuff in - i think it hides the alternate content until the flash >> is written or until it determines that the user doesn't have flash player. >> i think swfobject is a few k smaller in file size as well.
that's why it's called UFO - Unobstrusive Flash Object. kicks ass if you're a dictator-designer :-) i personally think it's worth the extra k's. micha _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
