| well i'll be doing a swfobject presentation... but swfobject doesn't really fit into the same category as other OSFlash projects around here...
On May 19, 2006, at 12:48 PM, John Grden wrote: well, I'm not one for conspiracy theories or anything, but I would consider that they're being a tad short-sided. I guess I can understand a crammed schedule and no room at the Inn, but not allowing me to submit a FLASH based project ( that meets their criteria btw ) simply because it's Open Source seems a bit targeted.
I sure hope I'm wrong.
JG
On 5/19/06, WIF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Premium sponsor of FF ? Adobe ......
you have bad luck ...
FlashForward is not very open source oriented ... very very mainstream
anyway, is FF still the same ? I feel they lost a lot compared to
other conferences ... more in connection with the community
sorry for you John,
Cedric
> I've submitted 4 entries: 2 non-os related, and 2 that are os
> related.
>
> Both the Open Source entries I have not recieved a confirmation
> email. When I tried again, same deal. No confirmation on the Open
> Source projects.
>
> When Blitz was told that our topics had been turned down for
> speaking at FF, the comment was " we're just not doing open source
> discussions this round " essentially. Even though only one of the
> topics was even remotely related to open source.
>
> Has anyone else experienced anything similar?
>
> Just wondering really.
>
> --
> John Grden - Blitz
> __
_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
--
John Grden - Blitz_______________________________________________ osflash mailing list |
_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
