Hi Raph, A new version of the server with completely refactored streaming code will be out soon as well. It should perform better than 0.4. Anyway, sign up for the red5 mailing list for notification about its release.
-Chris On 7/7/06, Raphaël ARBUZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'w be running as well so it seems like that would do the trick! > > Thanks a lot for your help. > > Raph > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: network congestion > To: Open Source Flash Mailing List > Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 2:06 PM > Subject: Re: [osflash] red 5 and ressources > > On a Celeron 2.4Ghz server with 1GB RAM and a 10Mbps connection (running > Centos 4.3 Linux), I added the red5 server process from the 0.4 tarball. > Aside from the bandwidth it consumes relaying connections, you'd hardly know > it was there. On the other hand, if you're running all that stuff on a > Windows box, you're on your own. > > Network Congestion > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > On 7/7/06, Raphaël ARBUZ < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi to all of you. > > > > I'm thinking about installing red 5 on my server machine. the thing is > that my machine (2.6 GHz, 512Mo) already runs Apache and MySQL so I was > wondering how much ressources red 5 would use and if that wouldn't slow down > my whole server. > > > > Thank you very much for any help! > > > > Raphael > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > osflash mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > _______________________________________________ > osflash mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > osflash mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > > > _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
