Chris Allen wrote: > That's true John, but I like the idea of using a SWF and SWFMill as > that means it can be run from the command line and doesn't require > that the SWF be created with the IDE, or that the IDE be open with the > FLA. SWFMill will generate an XML output of the SWF, so it might be as > easy as a simple XSLT transformation to MXML. I'm also pretty certain > that the reverse can be done with SWFMill as well. So XML -> SWFMill > -> SWF would also be possible. Unfortunately that doesn't get you an > FLA though. > > Anyway, I'm with Luke on this one; it does seem like a weird thing to > do. Maybe I will understand more of the advantage once it's built > though.
oh he was asking why fla 2 mxml? not why swf -> xml ? if so, i also dont really see the advantage, but if it keeps someone off the streets and out of danger it cant hurt :) _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
