My mistake: Junit is not Apache. Just so no one jumps on that. ;-) On 8/30/06, Chris Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/30/06, Ken Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think the point is that OSFlash represents many various projects > > whereas apache is just 1. Having a overseer to your project would not > > be what most managing projects on the list would want IMHO. But then > > again I am not one of them :) > > The Apache Foundation has tons of projects in addition to the more > famous http web server,: Ant, Tomcat, Junit, Cactus, MINA, Struts, > Axis, etc... The list goes on and on. > > > > > It would be more advantageous for the individual projects to continue to > > manage themselves than to try to get them all to conform to the same set > > of values dictated by a single entity. This is just one pitfall of this > > type of hierarchy, unless you allow the leader of each project to sit on > > a OSFlash board of trustees, which seems kind of ridiculous to me. > > > This is how the Apache Foundation is setup. > > Take a look at this link for more information: > http://apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html > > I don't think it's a bad model, but it may not make sense for us at this > point. > > > hank williams wrote: > > > How does apache handle this? They must have finances and they are > > > definitely centralized, and they have been enormously successful. > > > > > > Hank > > > > > > On 8/30/06, Aral Balkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> Hi all, > > >> > > >> > > >>> That's a gat idea but, who determine which projects get the money? > > >>> I mean, we knows that a IDE is necesary, but if we only have money > > >>> to one project, woule we spend it on ASDT? or maybe HXDT? > > >>> If we get some more money (to spend over various os-projects), > > >>> which projects get it? That could be a war... > > >>> > > >> I agree. It is much better to keep things as decentralized as > > >> possible. Let each project handle its own finances (if any). > > >> > > >> Aral > > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> osflash mailing list > > >> [email protected] > > >> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > > >> > > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > osflash mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > osflash mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > > >
_______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
