Unless maybe I ask Claus really nicely?
Alias
On 09/09/06, Bob Ippolito <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/9/06, Claus Wahlers < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Yeah, the whole concept of distribution is a bit muddled when you're
> > doing web stuff - If I have a library compiled into a swf, I'm basically
> > distributing it as soon as it loads in the browser.
>
> That's right. You'd either have to release the 'derivate work' under GPL
> too, or buy a commercial license from the authors. IANAL, of course, and
> even amongst lawyers i think there's dispute yet on how exactly to
> interpret the GPL in this regard (ie whether or not an application is
> 'derivate work' if it links in a GPLed library).
Statically linking in a GPL'd (or LGPL'd) library is without question
a derivative work. The GPL very explicitly states verbatim "This
General Public License does not permit incorporating your program into
proprietary programs."
GPL is definitely not an appropriate license for libraries unless you
are a hard-line GPL fanatic.
-bob
_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
_______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
