For the record, I was genuinely interested and wanted to help David. Antonio didnt seem to understand what David was after and simply seemed to be pushing something else into the thread that was of no relevance to the specific issue. Yet at the same time I try to explain to Antonio what David is after. Fine he made a simple mistake of not reading the subject line and blaming David for not being clear, but come on, I have hardly been unreasonable (or "mean" as put by Tim) to a) want to help David and b) want to clarify to Antonio what David was after.
But booooy Ken, you sure act what you project! Read through my posts and try and find me fill a space with soo many negative derogatory words!
On 9/25/06,
Tim Scollick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wow. I've never gotten that feeling from this list. People are passionate, but rarely mean. Too bad--that guy seemed to be a good addition to this list.
I guess you got to know when to fold 'em.On 9/24/06, Ken Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Regardless, you were only trying to help and didn't deserve the type of
responses from folks around here. I personally find this list polluted
with people responding in a " I'm right your wrong" fashion and find it
very tiring. There are plenty of ways to explain how your opinion to
others without being snobbish , standofish or downright arrogant.
I am done with reading the constant slew of negative, sefl rightous
responses to folks obviously just trying to lend a hand.
Kudos to you for taking time out of your day for trying to help folks
Antonio. And to you arrogant people, cya
*unsubscribes*
Antonio De Donatis wrote:
> My mistake, sorry.
>
> I recently changed the Outlook view related to the OSFlash mailing list to
> be able to go through it faster and that made the subject almost
> invisible... =)
>
> I wish to have been more helpful by suggesting XLEFF but it definitely has
> nothing to do with XML Schema.
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
>> From: David Holroyd [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: 23 September 2006 15:17
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [osflash] XMLSchema -> ActionScript
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 03:18:01AM +0100, Antonio De Donatis wrote:
>>
>>> Please note that I replied to the very first message, trying to help.
>>> There was no mention of XML Schema there, although Howard
>>>
>> mentioned the term
>>
>>> "schema" (lowercase).
>>>
>> Sorry about the confusion, my first message should have been a bit
>> clearer.
>>
>> Note the subject of the email though :)
>>
>>
>> ta,
>> dave
>>
>> --
>> http://david.holroyd.me.uk/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> osflash mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> osflash mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
>
_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
_______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
