I was thinking the same thing, but I didn't want to say anything and appear callous (not to say you were Nicolas). Maybe someone could explain why they feel being hosted by OSFlash is important?
Scott On 04/05/07, Nicolas Cannasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > A quick email to give you a heads up on what's happening with the > > OSFlash web site: > [...] > > We're just starting out on this and it will take approximately a month > > of time for us to get the new system in place. > > > > Here's to a new and improved OSFlash in the very near future! :) > > Hi, > > This is great news to see that some work is being done on OSFlash.org, > and I surely don't want to discourage it but I think it could be better > used for other stuff. > > In particular, creating and maintaining an automatic system for source > code repository and mailing list is quite time and resources consuming. > Especialy since there's already some very good alternatives such as > Google Code (http://code.google.com) and Google Groups > (http://groups.google.com) or other equivalent services that are easy > and free to use, with an high level of reliability and support. > > Instead, I would like to see more work being done on structuring the > OSFlash.org website, presenting each project and writing documentation > that tells people how/when to use a particular library or tool. I guess > this would be a lot more efficient than reinventing the wheel. > > Again, work being done OSFlash is always good news, > > Best, > Nicolas > > > _______________________________________________ > osflash mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
