What I miss, are probably the mentioned 'Future tools' from http://screenweaver.com/tools :-)
2007/6/13, Matthias Dittgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello Ian, > > I it is really easy to have built a first sample - I have done so in > the last minutes, but I find the following difference in SW3 and SWHX: > > SW3 > - Application (at least the main window) might be packed to a custom > .exe file with a custom icon and everything else is very clean > > SWHX > - I need the SWHX Bootloader and several dlls and so on. I can't > distribute as single file solution out of the box. The Bootloader has > the standard Screenweaver icon, which is then also the icon of my > application. > Please tell me, if/that I am wrong with this! ;-) > How do you distribute your apps? > > Matthias > > 2007/6/13, Ian Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 6/13/07, Matthias Dittgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > @Ian: There#s probably nothing wrong with SW HX, but I still had no > > > time to learn HaXe. I read all of Nicolas advertisements for HaXe, but > > > I liked the Actionscript API of SW3. SW HX doesn't offer this, yet, > > > does it? > > > > No - but it really doesn't take very long, it's extremely similar to > > AS2/AS3. But if you've found a different solution, that's fine... > > > > Ian > > > > _______________________________________________ > > osflash mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > > > _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
