Much obliged Valentin,

Cheers mate!
Sam

On Aug 1, 2007, at 8:27 PM, Valentin Backofen wrote:

> I think is entire discussion seems somewhat futile as this current  
> point
> in time as the engines are nothing but a fantasy. At work I have  
> nothing
> less then a monster of a machine, four processors (combining to a
> mindbogglingly big amount of processing power and ram I have stopped
> counting since quite some time. And the problem is this, I have been
> following papervision since quite some time now and I just cannot  
> see it
> applied as of yet. When running the papervision site I see my Firefox
> Ram usage spike to anything between 300 and 500 MB of ram and a entire
> processor is taken up for handling it. We sometimes forget (we  
> being my
> colleagues and myself) who we actually are developing for. In German
> there is a nice expression for those whom we want to see our 'stuff';
> Otto Normal Verbraucher. Meaning the average joe-blow, who probably is
> seeing our work on a machine bought a year ago or more. With maybe (if
> we are very very lucky) on gig of ram an a somewhat decent processor.
> This user will have absolutely no use for this in this current time.
> Please do not get me wrong, I am very enthusiastic on where this is
> going, but as of yet it all looks a bit to Castle of Wolfenstein to  
> me,
> if you catch my drift. Just my own two cents on the topic, though off
> course all my support and respect remains...just a late night  
> thought on
> my end...
>
> have a marvellous (AS-free) night....
>
> V
>
> On Wed, 2007-01-08 at 20:18 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Re: Q: Papervision 3D vs Sandy, vs Away3d (Samuel Agesilas)
> -- 
> Valentin Backofen
> 1-514-971-9628
> http://vevmedia.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> osflash mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org


_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org

Reply via email to