On 8/7/07, Martin Wood-Mitrovski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I fail to see how any of what he said could be considered trolling, just > because > you dont care about (or agree with) the point he's making doesnt mean he's > trolling. > > I thought he was quite clear and on point and if you dont agree with what he > said it would definitely be more constructive to continue the discussion, not > just go down some ad hominem dead end. > > oh well. >
well this thread, or most of it started about a close in the license of the spec that will prevent people to use that spec to read SWF (and by extension play SWF); someone bring an argument about missing features like screen reader in such devices as PSP and mobile phone; which I answered being a joke argument, because sorry most of the flash I experienced running on PSP and mobile device are games, and as the same as games for bigger device (XBOX, WII, etc.) those flash games are not designed at all for impaired people, this is simply not the audience target; which imho is a valid argument. and then I found that http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/are-accessibility-sites-fatally-flawed/ and I realized that i was just losing my time trying to argument with an "universalist" which obviously has an agenda against Adobe and Flash and enjoy a little too much contrcuting a big controversy abotu a sensitive topic such as accessibility (cf a troll defintion http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll ). I would rather spend time argumenting about why/what could change in that spec to make open source people more happy without just ranting at Adobe for the sake of it. cheers, zwetan _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
