This is big misconception with the creative commons license. CC is not intended to be used for software. You should use the GPL or MIT license instead: http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-gpl
Best, Paul. 2008/7/2 Niels Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > additional: > > http://creativecommons.org/license/ > > For those who know what they want and a form that gives them the right > license in return... Generative speaking > > > On 7/2/08 1:01 PM, "Giles Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The thanks should go to Grant! ;) > Some proper authoritative information on this subject would be really useful > to have on the OS Flash site. Any Lawyers/Part-time OS Flash Devs out > there??? > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Kamaleshwar Morjal > Sent: 02 July 2008 16:11 > To: Open Source Flash Mailing List > Subject: Re: [osflash] OS Source Code Licenses > > Very useful information. Many thanks. > > Giles Taylor wrote: > Hi All, > Grant Skinner has posted an overview of the more common OS Licenses on his > blog, examining how they relate to flash: > http://www.gskinner.com/blog/archives/2008/07/source_code_lic_1.html > > Interesting read! > Giles > > > > ________________________________ > > > _______________________________________________ > osflash mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > > > > > _______________________________________________ > osflash mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > > _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
