izak marais wrote: > Thanks for the feedback. I am glad that the compiler will work easier > than the player. Ubuntu indeed uses the nspluginwrapper and I previously > had the flash9 player working, however by following the first part of > the SDK installation instructions (uninstall falsh player plugin and > replace it with the debugger version distributed as part of the SDK) I > have managed to break it. > > However, the stand-alone-player (i.e. not the browser-plugin) > distributed with the SDK runs fine. So is it really necessary to have > the browser-plugin-player be the debugger version? Does the rest of the > SDK depend on this? Or could I use the stand-alone-player for debugging > and stick with the standard player?
just use the standalone. actually thats one thing that bothers me about FlexBuilder is that it defaults to generating html wrappers and launching them in the browser without any preferences to change it for new projects. what i find strange is that they could have easily integrated the player into an eclipse view either via some JNI stuff to directly host the plugin or via the browser component, after all Adobe should know their own technology....anyway, im rambling about FlexBuilder which isn't free or open source so not really appropriate :) _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
