Hi Paul, Perhaps Siggraph committee's will be able to give us a bit of feedback about what they are looking for so that we can submit a proposal that ticks all the boxes. Perhaps going the direction of GL3 + scene graphs providing the OSG as example might help.
W.r.t doing courses before/after Siggraph, a couple of years back we did a day session on the Sunday before Siggraph, this was well attended. Robert. On 8/15/07, Paul Martz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not sure what specifically hurt our proposal last year. I know our > proposal contained little in the way of curriculum and course notes. For the > s2008 proposal, we'll have OSG books as course material, plus Bob and I will > probably contribute some of the curriculum we've developed for our courses. > > For the s2008 proposal, we should note the standing-room-only crowd at the > s2007 BOF, and the fact that BOF time restrictions prevented us from > reaching the newbie crowd. This might help make the case for a course. There > are obviously many people out there who want to learn more about OSG. > > If our proposal gets shot down again, another possibility is to tack an OSG > course onto the start or end of SIGGRAPH, much like Bob and I are doing with > the Terrain Summit 07 conference this September. This has the downside of > extending an already long week, and also doesn't benefit from advertisement > on SIGGRAPH's courses Web site. > -Paul > > _______________________________________________ > osg-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org > _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
