Hi Mathias, I'm just trawling through the morning inbox and a blurry headed so not in a zone able to contemplate complex stuff too deeply. I will review your changes a latter date though.
Was there much fallout from applying your changes? Do things function w.r.t normal OSG usage and the type of usage you need? Robert. On 9/13/07, Mathias Fröhlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Robert, > > On Tuesday 21 August 2007, Robert Osfield wrote: > > On 8/21/07, Mathias Froehlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > What is missing then? > > > > You might be on the right track. > > > > > Can you help me? > > > > Well on round of bug fixing right now, so new feature development is > > not something on the cards right now. Feel free to experiment with > > CullVisitor.cpp/RenderState/Bin. > > I played with that. > Attached is a change to rev 7395 osg that moves the positional state container > from the render stage into the render bin. > > That means that the scope of such a positional state container like clip nodes > or light nodes is now a render bin and no longer a complete render stage. The > benefit is that you can more easy reuse clip planes or light nodes in > subgraphs of the scenegraph than before. > Before you needed to create a pre or post render camera for that positional > state containers, now we will only need a new render bin. > > Given that you can't tell something about the render order in a render bin > this is the smalles sensible scope for positional states. > > Can we have something like that? > Comments, whishes? > > Greetings > > Mathias > > _______________________________________________ > osg-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org > > > _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
