Hi Christophe, Its good to hear you're using the new wrappers. I believe the operator overloading was something that Mike was taking a look at.
Thanks! Jason On 9/18/07, Christophe Medard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We are, for a use from C# projects. > The fact is that some accessor functions are lacking of some important > classes (example Osg.NodeCallback.operator()()). > The solution adopted for instance - which isn't satisfying for will raise > problem when the osg API evolves - is to patch manually the header and > source files generated by the osgDotNet Generator from the osgwrapper_*.dll > ... > > Regards > -- > Christophe Médard > Société OKTAL (http://www.oktal.fr) > 2 impasse Boudeville > 31100 Toulouse (France) > Tél. : (+33) 5 62 11 50 10 > Fax : (+33) 5 62 11 50 29 > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Jason Beverage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > *To:* osg users <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 18, 2007 5:27 PM > *Subject:* [osg-users] Use of osgDotNet Wrappers > > Hi everyone, > > I'm just curious to see how many people are currently using or are > interested in using the new osgDotNet wrappers with their applications? My > company is currently using our own custom .NET wrappers for OSG but we're > interested in transitioning to Mike's wrappers and I wanted to get a feel > for the number of people in the OSG community that would be using the new > osgDotNet wrappers. > > Thanks! > > Jason > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > osg-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org > > > _______________________________________________ > osg-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org > >
_______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
