Hi Brian, There is chance that a bug in CullVisitor w.r.t CullSettings inheritance is responsible, this has now been fixed in SVN and the 2.3.7 dev version. However, I can't say for sure as I don't know your code well enough.
Uprading from 2.2 to SVN or 2.3.7 should be straight forward so it'd be worth trying out. There are a number of other bugs fixes rolled into SVN/2.3.7 as well. Robert. On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I've recently made the move from OSG 1.2 to 2.2. In the past, my code would > set up two cameras. One of these rendered the main view, and the other > rendered an IR scene to a texture. The code set up two cull masks (one for > each camera) of IR_NODE_MASK (0x1) and MAIN_NODE_MASK (0x2). > > Ex. > > irCamera->setCullMask(IR_NODE_MASK); > mainCamera->setCullMask(MAIN_NODE_MASK); > > With the new architecture in 2.2, the calls to setCullMask in regard to the > rendering of the cameras seems to behave differently than in 1.2. For > instance, there is a helicopter cockpit that we use when displaying the IR > rendered texture. When the IR texture is rendered, the cockpit should not be > visible (i.e. its node mask is set to MAIN_NODE_MASK.) This was the case > with 1.2, but with 2.2 the cockpit is visible. Since cameras have their own > node masks now, would I also need to set the cameras' node masks to be the > same as their respective cull masks? If so, why bother having a separate > cull mask? > > > irCamera->setNodeMask(IR_NODE_MASK); > mainCamera->setNodeMask(MAIN_NODE_MASK); > > > Thanks, > Brian > _______________________________________________ > osg-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org > _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
