Hi Robert,
Another aspect to the OpenSceneGraph development cycle is that while
quite a few users do track SVN and developer releases not everyone
does - many users wait till stable releases come out.
Yes, and that coupled with the fact that 2.0 and 2.2 have not had any
point releases (x.y.1,2,3...) means that people are generally a bit
further behind the SVN curve than they could be. In 2.x that hasn't
mattered that much because the API hasn't changed much apart from new
features being added (compared to the 1.2 -> 2.0 switch), but it means
that people will often have local fixes to the OSG code base that
they've been using on top of whichever stable release they were using,
while waiting for the next stable release. This makes it a bit harder to
make the switch when the stable release eventually comes out...
So I think in addition to all you said in the previous message (and with
which I agree), making a few point releases between stable releases
would help people keep up to date more easily.
J-S
--
______________________________________________________
Jean-Sebastien Guay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cm-labs.com/
http://whitestar02.webhop.org/
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
