Morning Robert,
Robert Osfield wrote:
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 9:05 AM, Paul Melis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes the fix was in r8282, osg 2.4 was released around r8238. This sounds
like a good candidate for inclusion in 2.4.1.
This was done after the moving to supporting DOM 2.1, so it's one of
sticky ones, is moving to DOM 2.1 a bug fix...
Looking a bit closer at it now, it seems r8282 was about DOM 1.3 -> 2.x,
not just 2.0 -> 2.1. At least judging from the log message. The collada
website doesn't really help, although they do have a list of API changes
this only starts half a year after 1.3.0 was released.
But this definitely seems like too big a step for inclusion in 2.4.1. I
would personally have less problems with making the 2.1 DOM the
dependency for 2.4.1 instead of 2.0.
Plugin upgrades are binary compatible of course as they don't have any
public interface for apps to get incompatible with, so it does make
them easier to slot in to stable maintenance releases. But then a DOM
2.1 based dae plugin will require a different external dependency
so...
As I mentioned on the other thread one has to use your discretion of
this type of stuff, weigh up the costs/benefits.
Yep...
Paul
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
