at the moment i try to locate the real bottleneck. i know your changes ref/unref, but i don't feel that this would be the bottle neck i have at the moment. but i will try the cvs version. hopply it would run much faster.
i will inform you as soon as i have locate the bottleneck. if we have to make some changes, we can discuss it further.
adegli
2006/6/26, Robert Osfield <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
If its the mutex lock/unlock instread Referenced:ref()/unref() that is
cause a bottlneck then try the CVS version of the OSG, it doesn't used
thread safe ref/unref() as widely as it did before, reducing the
overhead of running multi-threaded signifincantly.
On 6/25/06, Adrian Egli < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Niall Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
> Date: 24.06.2006 17:25
> Subject: Re: [Foxgui-users] Performance Issue : SceneView / FoxToolkit /
> OpenThreads / cURL
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On 24 Jun 2006 at 14:38, Adrian Egli wrote:
>
> > hi i guess microsoft has changed something in the kernel32.dll
> >
> > if i lock the resource with while and try lock it runs much much much
> better
>
> Looks to me like you need spin counts on your mutexs. Either use a
> spincounting critical section, or else use QMutex from TnFOX
> (http://www.nedprod.com/TnFOX/ ). You will find QMutex is several
> dozen times faster than anything windows provides for you (and the
> version in SVN even works on all architectures, though it's much
> faster on x86 or x64).
>
> Cheers,
> Niall
>
>
>
>
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
> easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> Foxgui-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/foxgui-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> osg-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users
> http://www.openscenegraph.org/
>
>
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users
http://www.openscenegraph.org/
_______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users http://www.openscenegraph.org/
