I solved handling the differences on the application side.
BTW does anybody know if there is a newer War Breaker specification than version 1 Draft 10? The document mentions the handling of marking text and infrared & radar signatures as a future extension. Are there any other (de facto) standards for retrieving state, articulation, attachment and weapon effects data (for instance node naming conventions)? kind regards, Roland Smeenk -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Weiblen Sent: vrijdag 11 augustus 2006 20:13 To: osg users Subject: Re: [osg-users] Old en new flight loader difference in comment parsing ah War Breaker, that was a cool project. a quick skim of the World Reference Model Entity Flight Specification (WRM EFS) from http://www.multigen-paradigm.com/support/dc_files/wrm.pdf or http://local.wasp.uwa.edu.au/~pbourke/dataformats/wrm/ "The articulated part's Group bead comment field may consist of several lines, each starting with the "@dis" keyword. The first line is a DIS Articulated Part Type Specification. The additional lines are DIS Articulated Part Motion Type Specifications, each assigned to a single line. There must be a DIS Articulated Part Motion Type Specification for each motion that is allowable for the articulated part." Rather than one correct behaviour, Id expect the translation from flt file to internal scenegraph representation is somewhat implementation-dependent. Cheers -- mew Smeenk, R.J.M. (Roland) wrote: > While parsing War Breaker WRM data in a flight file I encountered a > small difference between the old an new flight loader. > The new loader always puts the entire comment in a single node > description, while the old loader splits up the comment based upon end > of line characters and puts those into separate node descriptions. I > assume the old loader has the correct behaviour? > > kind regards, > > Roland Smeenk > > > > This e-mail and its contents are subject to the DISCLAIMER at > http://www.tno.nl/disclaimer/email.html > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > _______________________________________________ > osg-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users > http://www.openscenegraph.org/ _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users http://www.openscenegraph.org/ This e-mail and its contents are subject to the DISCLAIMER at http://www.tno.nl/disclaimer/email.html _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users http://www.openscenegraph.org/
