Hi Robert,

There is another usage of this documentation included inside
osgIntrospection. OSGEdit could benefit from it when the
osgIntrospection support is finished. I could use the attributes
documentation to automatically show tooltips in every editable
attribute...

Btw, I'm not dedicating a lot of time to the osgIntrospection port of
OSGEdit, it will not be released soon, sorry :( But I keep advancing as
I get time...

Regards.

El vie, 22-09-2006 a las 17:06 +0100, Robert Osfield escribió:
> A thought occured to me the other while I was waiting for a rebuild of
> the osgIntrospection wrappers, that perhaps we could have an option in
> osgIntrospection for having a documentation string for each namespace,
> class and member function/variable.  This documentation string would
> be one of the doxygen strings that are embedded in header files.
> You'd want to make this optional, as it'd be a bit more bloat to
> wrappers, but it should be too hard to add since genwrapper is based
> around doxygen anyway. 
> 
> So once you have a documentation string, and a suitable
> scripting/interpreted language like Lua or Phython you can have a
> script console window in your app that you could do something like:
> 
>    help(node)
> 
> Or
> 
>    help(node:getChild(i))
> 
> This was my thought.  Would it be useful?   That bit I can only
> speculate on.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> Robert.
> _______________________________________________
> osg-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users
> http://www.openscenegraph.org/
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users
http://www.openscenegraph.org/

Reply via email to