-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello,
Robert Osfield wrote: > Hi Don, > > On 11/14/06, Don Burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> The solution for OSG's distribution is as simple as changing a 1 to a >> 0 in >> Producer/Make/config: >> >> COMPILE_PRODUCER_OSG ?= 1 >> COMPILE_EXAMPLES ?= 1 >> > > This isn't a great solution as the non GNUmakefile users, i.e. Xcode and VS > users, are still hung up and left to dry. Since this guys make up a > significant chunk of the OSG community I really don't think this > solution is > viable. > > Robert. With all due respect to both of you guys, wouldn't it be simpler to split the offending code from Producer into a separate library dependent on both Producer and OSG? I think that would be the simplest and least headache-prone solution (i.e. option 3 from Robert's list). The other options are kludges, to be honest, and may complicate things to the point that people will turn away from using OSG with Producer due to such hassle. A quick grep through the source of Producer shows that nothing else is using it, so it shouldn't be a big problem to split it off into a separate lib. Forking of the libraries should be only the very last option and is always detrimental to the projects involved - I certainly hope that you two can get along well enough so that this wouldn't be required from neither side. Regards, Jan - -- Jan Ciger GPG public key: http://www.keyserver.net/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mandriva - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFWh0cn11XseNj94gRAiQwAKDfvcK98fOP70MNsKJOMfaE5hUV+wCgltcC kiCfkNBnEAL22yD/HknBE2A= =Ksnt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users http://www.openscenegraph.org/
