Hi Paul,
On 12/21/06, Paul Martz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, our current (unchanged) code uses both spellings; we should at least
be consistent.
I'm willing to go with Google. If I search on "define: tessellate", I get
results. If I search on "define: tesselate", Google asks me "do you mean
'define: tessellate'?"
As much as I hate to admit it, even the Microsoft Office spell checker
agrees that "tessellate" is correct.
The downside of going with two Ls is that it conflicts with GLU; otherwise
it seems like the right way to go.
Tessellator does seem more consistent with the rest of tessellate
family of words. I'm happy to go with the proper "english" verison,
although Tessellator does even seem to be an official part of the
english lanaguage :-)
Once I've completed some other work I'll merge the changes.
Next up will be #define glColour glColor
Or perhaps we should just hassle the ARB to do the right thing, since
the majority of the tech in the worldwide must be outside the US..
;-D
Robert.
Robert.
Robert.
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users
http://www.openscenegraph.org/
