http://industry.slashgeo.org/article.pl?sid=07/02/14/1532237&from=rss


  In the original article:
http://zcologia.com/news/348/beneficial-proprietary-extensions-of-open-source-software/
I replied, trying to make a case for proprietary contributors (such as myself) to numerous projects, including OSG. Apparently for some reason the author dismisses OSG. Perhaps it's not considered "geospatial" enough, but I'd say that a huge number of OSG users utilize it in some geospatial way. Many 3D scenes (other than like molecular and radiographic visualization, and other "local" data) aren't very interesting until the happen in an environment, usually a geospatially-derived one.

--
     Chris 'Xenon' Hanson | Xenon @ 3D Nature | http://www.3DNature.com/
                3D World Maps: http://3d-world-map.com/
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users
http://www.openscenegraph.org/

Reply via email to