Hi Glen, Thanks for the info. A lot of my file names are similar, and I am constantly changing them.
Zach _____ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn Waldron Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 09:13 To: osg users Subject: Re: [osg-users] Linux vs. Windows file system Here's another data point to consider... I came across this discussion in which the poster suggests that NTFS' indexing scheme does not favor a large number of similarly-named files in a single folder (which is pretty much what you get from osgdem). http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.win2000.file_system/browse_t hread/thread/e7b4d86095272427/257d6a0a740f9d6c <http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.win2000.file_system/browse_ thread/thread/e7b4d86095272427/257d6a0a740f9d6c> Upshot is that randomization of filenames might make a difference. -gw On 3/11/07, Zach Deedler <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: Hello osg-soldiers, I'm not trying to wage an OS war here. I know that is what you usually get with a subject line like this. I'd just like to know others experiences with file system performance on Linux vs. Windows for OSG, and OSG paging in particular. I must be fairly confident that switching to linux will solve some of our paging problems before I recommend it to my boss. Also, if anybody has any suggestions on how to improve paging on windows, I'd appreciate it. I've tried changing the size of the paging file, and such but haven't had a lot of luck. Zach _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users http://www.openscenegraph.org/ -- Glenn Waldron : Pelican Mapping : http://pelicanmapping.com
_______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users http://www.openscenegraph.org/
