2007/3/30, Robert Osfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi Adrian, I really couldn't parse your paragraph, is it that under XP the OSG performs better, or under OSX?
osX Which platform has better framerate, which platform is more consistent
in its frame rate?
80-100 constant : osx 80-100 but drop downs, short time 20 : windows Which OSG version and viewer library do you use? svn : latest Robert.
On 3/30/07, Adrian Egli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi > > i am working on porting my application form windows XP to mac os/x. it's > really intereseting to see that openscenegraph doesn't work as well as it > does under mac os/x (mac book pro, 2.33GH, 2GB RAM) > i tested the same huge database ond my mac book with dual boot (windows and > os/x) i have to say that the thread management under windows is not really > bad, but if we compare it with the os/x ones, it > a huge differnt. the application has a more rubost and constant frame rate. > May also the graphic cards driver is much better fitted to this env. so who > also mad such tests, and got different framerates behaviour > under different os. it would be really important to find the bottleleck or > the issue in the thread management. i remebmer well that there are also > others recognizing such problems. > > but i like to say, it works still also quite good under windows xp, but only > comparing make the difference. > > /adegli > > _______________________________________________ > osg-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users > http://www.openscenegraph.org/ > _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users http://www.openscenegraph.org/
_______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users http://www.openscenegraph.org/
