Great, thanks.  My point was to emphasize that the SVN tags are also a release
mechanism, so if a .zip gets respun for some reason (as was the case of 1.9.7 I
think, the one with the super long filenames), then the tag must get remade as
well to keep everything synced

cheers
-- mew


Robert Osfield wrote:
> Hi Mike,
> 
> On 6/7/07, Mike Weiblen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>> Can I request that for these official releases, the URL to the actual
>> SVN tag also be published in the announcement?
>>
>> I prefer not to use the .zip archive; instead I'm pulling the source
>> directly into my buildsystem SVN from your SVN using an svn:external
> 
> 
> OK.  They are all standardised now, so the tag is same as the version
> number i.e. 1.9.8 release was tagged as OpenSceneGraph-1.9.8 and the
> URL is:
> 
> http://www.openscenegraph.com/svn/osg/OpenSceneGraph/tags/OpenSceneGraph-1.9.8/
> 
> 
> Since its now automated I know that the next two releases will be:
> 
> http://www.openscenegraph.com/svn/osg/OpenSceneGraph/tags/OpenSceneGraph-1.9.9/
> 
> 
> and...
> 
> http://www.openscenegraph.com/svn/osg/OpenSceneGraph/tags/OpenSceneGraph-2.0
> 
> 
> :-)
> 
> As long as non big issues arise between 1.9.9  and 2.0... if this
> happens we might just have to have a 1.9.10.
> 
> Also of note is that I've started putting the data up on SVN:
> 
>   http://www.openscenegraph.com/svn/osg/OpenSceneGraph-Data/trunk
> 
> Robert.
> _______________________________________________
> osg-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users
> http://www.openscenegraph.org/
> 


-- 
Mike Weiblen -- Austin Texas USA -- http://mew.cx/

_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users
http://www.openscenegraph.org/

Reply via email to