-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Il 02/03/2013 01:16, Frank Warmerdam ha scritto:
> I must admit I'm not absolutely certain what the best way is > to move OSGeo4W forward. Given the right person interested > in working on the project full time (or a substantial part time) > at a "scrappy" price, I'd push for funding but I'm not sure that > such a person exists. Well, I think it depends a lot on what do you mean with "scrappy": can you work out a potential budget? I'm sure we can find support from our huge Windows power users base. > There are also some technical direction issues with > OSGeo4W that remain open. > - Should we stay focused on just 32bit or add/switch to 64bit? IMHO adding 64bit is important. > - Should we do "complete refreshes" every could of > years instead of the package by package updating > that works well at the high level but not so well down > in the low level packages (like GDAL). IMHO a continuous refresh (à la Debian unstable) is the way to go. > Anyways, I don't want to dive into great detail on the board > list, but I do think OSGeo4W is worthy of OSGeo funding > if the project had a clear plan how such funding would > work. Agreed fully - thanks for your thoughts. All the best. - -- Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia www.faunalia.eu Full contact details at www.faunalia.eu/pc Nuovi corsi QGIS e PostGIS: http://www.faunalia.it/calendario -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlExwksACgkQ/NedwLUzIr4XuwCdHc+9aULI5WZG5sU/V2YgblFp KNUAoJ/9ApsahbIz0leTmdH6pvhSQIbw =x+wc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ osgeo4w-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/osgeo4w-dev
