On 4 April 2013 22:05, Frank Warmerdam <warmer...@pobox.com> wrote: > Mateusz, > > I watched the CoApp video, and skimmed the last blog post on the site and > I'm left feeling it is still rather immature and also that it will depend on > a variety of skills I don't have (around Visual Studio projects, etc). On > the appealing side it would be wonderful to work with folks who know how to > put things together effectively, and many underlying packages we depend on > (ie. Apache, Python, PHP, Postgresql, ssl) are being addressed as part of > the core provided packages of CoApp. > > My inclination at this point is to keep an eye on CoApp with the idea it > could be a next generation OSGeo4W but not to make any major commitment yet > unless there is someone in the community that wants to lead the charge.
Frank, I agree with your reasoning. I have been interested in CoApp for months now, but due to personal commitments at the moment, I've had to put it aside. So, I can't volunteer to lead such transition to CoApp, I regret. > CoApp certainly has the possibility of being an ideal platform for open > source geospatial (and non-geospatial) software distribution on windows. Yes, I'm having similar impression. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net _______________________________________________ osgeo4w-dev mailing list osgeo4w-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/osgeo4w-dev