The RFC looks good to me too. The process of introducing and passing proposals is straightforward, with a process for working through dispute, using methods that we've seen used successfully elsewhere.

I don't have anything to add, except perhaps a mention that adding/removing individual packages from the distribution doesn't /necessarily /need an RFC, but that it is good form to announce on the mailing list in advance of intention to do so.

cheers,

matt wilkie
--------------------------------------------
Geomatics Analyst
Information Management and Technology
Yukon Department of Environment
10 Burns Road * Whitehorse, Yukon * Y1A 4Y9
867-667-8133 Tel * 867-393-7003 Fax
http://environmentyukon.gov.yk.ca/geomatics/
--------------------------------------------

On 25/09/2013 3:34 PM, Tamas Szekeres wrote:
Frank,

The RFC <http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo4w/wiki/rfc1_pmc> looks pretty good, thanks for putting that together. Once the PSC is formed, I'm keen on writing a second one where we could start thinking about the primary objectives and requirements of the system we should realize, I think we all have quite some ideas, and experiences in creating windows builds (both positive and negative) which makes it possible to find out the right direction to follow.

I also think packaging on Windows is a different thing, other platforms may apply for a separate governance regarding to the binary distributions, there might be some common aspects, though.

Best regards,

Tamas



2013/9/25 Frank Warmerdam <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>

    Folks,

    I have initiated an RFC for a project management committee for
    OSGeo4W.  I'd encourage everyone interested in participating to joint
    the osgeo4w-dev mailing list and to continue detailed discussion
    there.

    http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/osgeo4w-dev

    I think this list (osgeo-discuss) is a great place to discuss linkages
    between different packaging efforts.

    Best regards,
    Frank


_______________________________________________
osgeo4w-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/osgeo4w-dev

Reply via email to