Hi Martin,

On Tue, 07. Jun 2016 at 09:17:09 +0200, Martin Landa wrote:
> 2016-06-07 9:14 GMT+02:00 Jürgen E. <[email protected]>:
> >> but still 2.1 right and not trunk (2.2)? Thanks, Martin

> > No, trunk.
 
> I am confused. The last tarball is from May 4. The name of packages
> reflects version 2.1 [1] ?

The version 2.1 was hardwired.  But it's building trunk.


On Tue, 07. Jun 2016 at 09:18:03 +0200, Martin Landa wrote:
> >> but still 2.1 right and not trunk (2.2)? Thanks, Martin

> > No, trunk.
 
> I am confused. The last tarball is from May 4. The name of packages
> reflects version 2.1 [1] ?

Ah, the x86_64 build is failing - and package.cmd to return that properly.  The
x86 builds were fine - and of course that was where I looked.

Checking...


Jürgen

-- 
Jürgen E. Fischer           norBIT GmbH             Tel. +49-4931-918175-31
Dipl.-Inf. (FH)             Rheinstraße 13          Fax. +49-4931-918175-50
Software Engineer           D-26506 Norden             http://www.norbit.de

Attachment: pgpP4EyYYMVWk.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
osgeo4w-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/osgeo4w-dev

Reply via email to