That would actually be my preferred solution yes, off the top of my
head, I can't think of a situation where you would actually provide
(using declarative services) the ManagedService interface unless it's
for this purpose. However, to be on the safe side, you might want to
restrict this behavior to services not specifying a PID explicitly (or
specifying a PID equal to the service id).

Thanks,
Fredrik.

On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 11:45, Peter Kriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I do not think this is possible with the current specification. However, we
> are working on an update and we can still discuss this requirement.
>
> Would it solve your problem if you could implement a ManagedService
> interface? If the DS then saw you implemented this interface it would not
> deactivate you, but just give you the dictionary?
>
> Kind regards,
>
>        Peter Kriens
>
> On 13 aug 2008, at 11:28, Fredrik Alströmer wrote:
>
>> Hi people,
>>
>> according the OSGi Service Platform Service Compendium R4, 4.1, the
>> Declarative Services will interact with the Configuration Admin
>> Service and, if there's an update of the configuration with the same
>> PID as the service id, the component will be deactivated and
>> reactivated with the new configuration properties. What I haven't been
>> able to figure out though, is there a way to disable this behavior and
>> let the component listen for configuration changes itself during
>> run-time (it's obviously possible to define a separate PID, but that
>> wouldn't be passed to the component at activation, and it wouldn't be
>> possible to put the defaults in the component xml, I assume, which
>> would be a shame).
>>
>> What I want to do is either use a managed service, or a configuration
>> listener (which I suppose is more or less the same for this purpose,
>> although a managed service would be more convenient, as it could be
>> managed by the declarative services), and get configuration updates
>> without having to reactivate the component, yet still get the current
>> configuration through the component context when the component is
>> activated. Is this possible somehow? Or did I miss something blatantly
>> obvious perhaps?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Fredrik.
>> _______________________________________________
>> OSGi Developer Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSGi Developer Mail List
> [email protected]
> https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
>

_______________________________________________
OSGi Developer Mail List
[email protected]
https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev

Reply via email to