Can you suggest the text to add to the spec? --
BJ Hargrave Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM OSGi Fellow and CTO of the OSGi Alliance [EMAIL PROTECTED] office: +1 386 848 1781 mobile: +1 386 848 3788 From: Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: OSGi Developer Mail List <[email protected]> Date: 2008/08/22 02:36 AM Subject: Re: [osgi-dev] Correct XML format for SCR? > > Per the XML schema for SCR, which uses the default values for > elementFormDefault and attributeFormDefault, I think this is already > well specified. I don't really want to repeat information from the XML > Schema spec in the DS spec. The only way to be more explicit would be to > put elementFormDefault and attributeFormDefault in the SCR schema and > state the default value of unqualified for them. I understand (and appreciate) that a spec should be as concise as possible. But people familiar with XML very easily missinterpret the spec (like me); so one short sentence in the namespace paragraph seem to be very appropriate to me. Thanks Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ OSGi Developer Mail List [email protected] https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
_______________________________________________ OSGi Developer Mail List [email protected] https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
