Hi BJ and all, Thank you for your comments.
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:19:34 -0400 BJ Hargrave <[email protected]> wrote: BJ> > Please think about Q2 I had posted. BJ> > BJ> > According to the description in "112.5.2 Satisfied", BJ> > the all three conditions described in 112.5.2 still keep true and BJ> > the component configuration will NOT become unsatisfied. BJ> > BJ> > Therefore it should not be deactivated for answer of Q2. BJ> > BJ> > I mean, the spec should be clarified for this point, shouldn't it? BJ> BJ> You are right. I misspoke in my prior mail for Q2. In Q2 then, since the BJ> component is satisfied, when a new service A is registered, the component BJ> should remain activated. So, how the current Equinox DS impl works is a bug ? or The spec should be rewrite to be clarified ? > c.f. In Equinox DS impl, activation will be done after deactivation is > done. Is there anybody who can tell how do other DS impls work ? I mean felix, knopflerfish or others... ======= Ikuo YAMASAKI _______________________________________________ OSGi Developer Mail List [email protected] https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
