Hello Neil, On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Neil Bartlett <[email protected]> wrote:
> You only mentioned it once, and you said it's not an option because > it's C rather that C++. I'm curious why that matters? > I think to ease .net developers into the framework they would like to not cast from and to void*. But I don't know. But probably existing COM servers could work with celix with a lot of casting. It would just not feel natural. > When it comes to type safety, even Java OSGi is not particularly > typesafe as services must be casted before they can be used. At least > this will remain the case until 4.3 comes along. > COM provides QueryInterface a java-like "instance of" functionality which would improve on type safety imho. At least its type safe enough in the current COM world. > Cheers > Neil > > On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Philipp Kursawe <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hello Felix, > > > > Uhmm yes? I mentioned it several times in my mail and also why it is not > an > > option ;) Its not C++ and its not type safe. > > > > Regards, > > Phil > > > > On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Felix Meschberger <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi > >> > >> Have you heard of Apache Celix [1] ? > >> > >> Regards > >> Felix > >> > >> [1] http://incubator.apache.org/celix > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > OSGi Developer Mail List > > [email protected] > > https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev > > >
_______________________________________________ OSGi Developer Mail List [email protected] https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
