Hi BJ, On Fri, 6 May 2011 22:31:46 -0400 BJ Hargrave <[email protected]> wrote:
BJ> Yes. Since PackageAdmin has been deprecated and replace by the Bundle BJ> Wiring API, we will not be updating PackageAdmin any more. Got it. BJ> You list 2 suggested changes below. The first one should be to replace BJ> ACTIVE with the more general term "started" which can include lazy BJ> activated bundles in the STARTING state. I'm confused a little bit . For me, a. "started" means "in the state of ACTIVE". b. a lazy activated bundle can be in the STARTING state. Therefore the following description covers all. >> 2 Each bundle in the graph that is in the state of STARTING, ACTIVE or STOPPING will be stopped as described in the Bundle.stop method. (I had miswritten "STARTING, ACTIVE or" instead of "STARTING, ACTIVE or STOPPING") BJ> The second one is incorrect: the BJ> remaining steps will not be ignored. That is why it is not a numbered list BJ> item. That is different from what Richard wrote: Richard> Either the refresh operation will end up waiting for B to become active Richard> before stopping it and refreshing it or the entire refresh operation Richard> will fail because B couldn't be stopped. Which is expected ? or it might depend on the implementation because the spec is ambiguous. Best regards, Ikuo ======= Ikuo YAMASAKI _______________________________________________ OSGi Developer Mail List [email protected] https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
