:-)

The reason for the folders is that the enterprise javadoc is built with 
links to the core javadoc, ../core/, with the assumption both jars are 
unzipped into the same folder. You can see this at 
http://www.osgi.org/javadoc/r5/core/ and 
http://www.osgi.org/javadoc/r5/enterprise/

-- 

BJ Hargrave
Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM
OSGi Fellow and CTO of the OSGi Alliance
[email protected]

office: +1 386 848 1781
mobile: +1 386 848 3788





From:   Ancoron Luciferis <[email protected]>
To:     [email protected], 
Date:   2012/06/14 03:46
Subject:        Re: [osgi-dev] OSGi Core and Enterprise R5 jars for Maven
Sent by:        [email protected]



Maven doesn't care about this, but some IDEs will, I guess.

On 06/13/2012 08:58 PM, BJ Hargrave wrote:
> The javadoc jars do not have the javadoc in the root of the JAR (e.g. it
> is in core/ folder for core javadoc jar, enterprise/ folder for
> enterprise javadoc jar). Is this OK for maven?
>
> --
>
> *BJ Hargrave*
> Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM
> OSGi Fellow and CTO of the _OSGi Alliance_ <http://www.osgi.org/>_
> [email protected]_ <mailto:[email protected]> 
>
> office: +1 386 848 1781
> mobile: +1 386 848 3788
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: David Bosschaert <[email protected]>
> To: OSGi Developer Mail List <[email protected]>,
> Date: 2012/06/13 11:34
> Subject: [osgi-dev] OSGi Core and Enterprise R5 jars for Maven
> Sent by: [email protected]
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Now that Core and Enterprise R5 are released [1] I prepared the jars
> for upload into maven.
>
> Before publishing them I would appreciate if someone could have a look
> and check that they are ok.
> The staging areas are:
> core: https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/orgosgi-672/
> enterprise: https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/orgosgi-673/
>
> I think these are ok, but it would be great if someone could:
> * check that the ultimate jars are ok
> * check that the included javadoc and source is in the right format
> * check that the signatures are ok.
>
> Thanks!
>
> David
>
> [1]
> 
http://blog.osgi.org/2012/06/core-release-5-and-enterprise-release-5.html
> _______________________________________________
> OSGi Developer Mail List
> [email protected]
> https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSGi Developer Mail List
> [email protected]
> https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev

_______________________________________________
OSGi Developer Mail List
[email protected]
https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev


_______________________________________________
OSGi Developer Mail List
[email protected]
https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev

Reply via email to