Yes, sorry -- I agree with Tom's amended approach.
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 3:53 PM, David Bosschaert < [email protected]> wrote: > Thanks all for the responses. > > On 22 January 2013 15:32, Neil Bartlett <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The best way to deal with split packages is to hot have split packages. >> It's worth spending some effort to refactor if at all possible. >> > > Of course. You not having them is always better and hot split packages > would definitely scare me ;) > > >> Chris' approach is the second best, and is not Equinox-specific. Ie it >> should work on any framework. >> > > Chris' approach or the amended approach as proposed by Tom? I would say > the latter? > > Cheers, > > David > > > _______________________________________________ > OSGi Developer Mail List > [email protected] > https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev >
_______________________________________________ OSGi Developer Mail List [email protected] https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
