*Peter*
there is no "work" per se, just a feasibility study
https://github.com/barchart/barchart-service/wiki/OBR
my current conclusion: "obr is not there yet".
Thank you,
Andrei
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [osgi-dev] obr resource id?
From: Peter Kriens <[email protected]>
To: Andrei Pozolotin <[email protected]>
Cc: OSGi Developer Mail List <[email protected]>
Date: Thu 11 Apr 2013 07:23:55 AM CDT
> There is no way a single file will scale ... partly from a size issue,
> partly from the fact that it will be a moving target. Moving targets
> work very badly with resolving. I am working on this exact problem
> right now. For whom are you doing this work if I may ask?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Peter Kriens
>
>
>
> On 2 apr. 2013, at 15:51, Andrei Pozolotin wrote:
>
>> *Peter*
>>
>> do you have any advice if foresting is right the approach to
>> scalability of obr server
>> https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/NEXUS-5647
>>
>> original spec for repository.xml was speaking of 10,000 bundles.
>> how would you go about 10,000,000 bundles?
>> on the same server?
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Andrei
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Re: [osgi-dev] obr resource id?
>> From: Peter Kriens <[email protected]>
>> To: Andrei Pozolotin <[email protected]>
>> Cc: OSGi Developer Mail List <[email protected]>
>> Date: Tue 02 Apr 2013 01:24:08 AM CDT
>>> It is likely obsolete. There is another implementation now for the
>>> latest spec on github/osgi.
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>>
>>> Peter Kriens
>>>
>>> On 29 mrt. 2013, at 15:55, Andrei Pozolotin wrote:
>>>
>>>> Peter:
>>>>
>>>> so this implementation
>>>> https://github.com/sonatype/nexus-obr-plugin/tree/master/nexus-obr-plugin/src/main/java/org/osgi/impl/bundle/obr/resource
>>>>
>>>> is basically obsolete and need re-write for r5?
>>>>
>>>> thank you
>>>>
>>>> Andrei.
>>>>
>>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>>> Subject: Re: [osgi-dev] obr resource id?
>>>> From: Peter Kriens <[email protected]>
>>>> To: OSGi Developer Mail List <[email protected]>
>>>> Date: Fri 29 Mar 2013 03:20:31 AM CDT
>>>>> In r5 there is no more resource id. An osgi.content capability
>>>>> provides a SHA of the underlying artifact. The osgi.identity
>>>>> provides the bsn + version which should be unique.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Peter Kriens
>>>>>
>>>>> On 28 mrt. 2013, at 15:46, Andrei Pozolotin wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> *Hello.*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can someone please clarify if obr resource id should be
>>>>>> unique in a given resource.xml?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Specifically, how maven snapshots should be represented?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Andrei
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> OSGi Developer Mail List
>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>> https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> OSGi Developer Mail List
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
OSGi Developer Mail List
[email protected]
https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
