very funny link, yes. but also argument against osgi? UXCTBFFFOSGI R-5.0 :-)
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: web starter-kit: osgi + vert.x? From: Peter Kriens <[email protected]> To: Andrei Pozolotin <[email protected]> Cc: OSGi Developer Mail List <[email protected]> Date: Wed 31 Jul 2013 02:33:31 AM CDT > I think vert.x is only a part of the whole picture. I think what is > needed are more hard choices, one of the big problems in Java is that > everything is flexible > (http://discuss.joelonsoftware.com/?joel.3.219431.12). > > And at first sight vert.x seems to have a lot of overlap with OSGi. I > believe OSGi can make a lot of things a lot simpler than without OSGi > if you go with the flow. I think vert.x is too much of a framework > that was not specifically developed for OSGi to actually really > leverage OSGi. > > That said, did not look deep and it does look interesting. Thanks, > kind regards, > > Peter Kriens > > On 30 jul. 2013, at 19:20, Andrei Pozolotin wrote: > >> *Peter:* >> >> here you stated the you want starter web kit >> http://blog.osgi.org/2013/06/i-am-back.html >> >> I am curious if osgi + vert.x fits the bill? >> http://underlap.blogspot.com/2012/06/osgi-case-study-modular-vertx.html >> >> Thank you, >> >> Andrei >> >
_______________________________________________ OSGi Developer Mail List [email protected] https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
