I am pretty sure that if, as a consumer, you create a configuration with getConfiguration(pidX), it gets bound to you. Otherwise, why would getConfiguration(pidX, null) even exist?
On Aug 12, 2013, at 14:46 , Thomas Watson <[email protected]> wrote: > There are two cases where a location is bound 'dynamically'. > > 1) A bundle calls ConfigurationAdmin.getConfiguration(pidX) and a new > configuration is created (i.e. no existing configuration exists). In this > case it gets dynamically bound to the calling bundle. > 2) A configuration exists with pidX with a null location. A) a bundle calls > ConfigurationAdmin.getConfiguration(pidX), calling bundle gets bound or B) a > ManagedService is registered with pidX, the registering bundle gets bound. > > The only way to have a 'statically' bound configuration is when a management > agent uses ConfigurationAdmin.getConfiguration(pidX, location) where location > != null. All other situations will be dynamically bound and should result in > the configuration getting unbound when the bound bundle is uninstalled. To > me that makes the most sense and is the most simple explanation. > > Tom > > > > <graycol.gif>Marcel Offermans ---08/12/2013 06:14:40 AM---On Aug 12, 2013, at > 13:02 , Felix Meschberger <[email protected]> wrote: > Somehow this comes up > ev > > From: Marcel Offermans <[email protected]> > To: OSGi Developer Mail List <[email protected]>, > Date: 08/12/2013 06:14 AM > Subject: Re: [osgi-dev] [CM] Static vs. dynamic Location Binding > Sent by: [email protected] > > > > On Aug 12, 2013, at 13:02 , Felix Meschberger <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Somehow this comes up every now and then and I am always lost finding the > > definitive answer ... > > > > Situation A > > - Configuration created with getConfiguration(pidA, null) > > - ConfigurationAdmin supplies to ManagedService MSA > > > > Situation B > > - Configuration created with getConfiguration(pidB, null) > > - consumer calls ConfigurationAdmin.getConfiguration(pidB) > > > > Situation C > > - Configuration created with getConfiguration(pidC) > > > > IIUIC Situation A creates a dynamic location binding to MSA's bundle. When > > the bundle is uninstalled, the location is reset to null. > > > > In Situation C, the location binding is static to the caller's bundle > > location. > > > > What about Situation B: On the one hand, the same API is used as in > > Situation C. Thus one might argue, this results in a static binding to the > > caller's bundle. On the other hand, one might argue, that this binding is > > dynamically set upon the first time it is used by a bundle. > > > > What is the correct answer in Situation B ? Static or Dynamic ? > > Location binding only applies when a configuration object is *created* in > response to someone calling getConfiguration (or getFactoryConfiguration), so > in B: > - the first all makes it dynamic > - the second call binds it to the consumer > > At least, that's my interpretation. :) > > Greetings, Marcel > > _______________________________________________ > OSGi Developer Mail List > [email protected] > https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > OSGi Developer Mail List > [email protected] > https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
_______________________________________________ OSGi Developer Mail List [email protected] https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
